Federal Advisor on Political Affairs Rana Sanaullah emphasized the significance of including Maulana Fazlur Rehman in the ongoing constitutional amendment process, despite the challenges posed by the Supreme Court's decision on Article 63A. Sanaullah noted that even without Rehman’s votes, amendments could still potentially pass, but insisted that it would be unwise to exclude him from negotiations. He expressed this while talking to a private TV channel. Sanaullah expressed concerns regarding the current relationship between political institutions, suggesting that mutual conflicts could be resolved if each entity operated within its designated limits. He criticized the apex court for taking an extended 90 days to interpret constitutional matters, arguing that such delays raise questions about the authority of the judiciary, particularly when it comes to crucial decisions affecting the political landscape.

He pointed out that the judiciary's influence over constitutional amendments, particularly referencing the controversial 19th Amendment, has sparked significant backlash. “The Supreme Court cannot dictate to Parliament,” Sanaullah asserted, calling for a reevaluation of the judicial authority in legislative matters. The discussion also touched upon the need for consensus on Article 8 of the proposed amendments, which has faced scrutiny from various political factions. Sanaullah revealed that discussions had previously taken place with Maulana Rehman, and while some amendments were agreed upon, he urged that all parties come together to finalize the remaining issues. Ultimately, Sanaullah underscored the importance of collaboration, stating, “We need Maulana to complete the numbers. It will not be appropriate to complete the numbers for constitutional amendments by excluding him.” As the political landscape continues to evolve, the resolution of these tensions will be crucial for the stability of the country's governance.

Credit: Independent News Pakistan